Conectando la teoría regulatoria y la economía heterodoxa para la implementación efectiva de la política industrial
una exploración teórica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v76ia.10768Palabras clave:
desarrollo, economía heterodoxa, política industrial, regulación, gobernanza regulatóriaResumen
: La teoría de la regulación se ha basado durante mucho tiempo en el léxico de la "reforma regulatoria" para promover la eficiencia económica estática y los modelos de gobernanza disciplinados y rígidos. Aunque numerosos autores hayan señalado la naturaleza tecnocrática de la "ortodoxia regulatoria" existente y, en respuesta a ella, subrayado la necesidad de incorporar valores no económicos en la toma de decisiones regulatorias para mejorar su componente democrático, las críticas contemporáneas no llegan a reposicionar la regulación sobre una base económica más progresista. Este artículo profundiza esta brecha epistémica a partir de contribuciones teóricas de corrientes de investigación interdisciplinarias en sintonía con el pensamiento económico heterodoxo. Criticamos la "ortodoxia regulatoria" tanto a nivel sustantivo como procedimental, esbozando nuevos parámetros regulatorios macro, meso y micro. En última instancia, ofrecemos contribuciones sobre lo que una heterodoxia regulatoria podría agregar a la teoría y la práctica para una implementación efectiva de políticas industriales.
Descargas
Citas
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power in Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile Books.
Adelman, I. (2001) “Fallacies in Development Theory and Their Implications for Policy,” in Meier, G. M. and Stiglitz, J. E. (eds.) Frontiers of Development Economics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 103–134.
Andrews, M. (2013) The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development, The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139060974.
Braithwaite, J. (2006) “Responsive regulation and developing economies,” World Development, 34(5 (special issue)), pp. 884–898. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.021.
Braithwaite, J. (2008) Regulatory Capitalism: how it works, ideas for making it work better. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (1995) “Development Economics and the World Bank’s Identity Crisis,” Review of International Political Economy, 2(2), pp. 211–247.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C., Oreiro, J. L. and Marconi, N. (2015) Development Macroeconomics: New Developmentalism as a Growth Strategy. New York: Routledge.
Burlamaqui, L. and Kattel, R. (2014) “Development Theory: Convergence, Catch-up or Leapfrogging? A Schumpeter-Minsky-Kregel Approach,” in Papadimitriou, D. B. (ed.) Contributions to economic theory, policy, development and finance : essays in honor of Jan A. Kregel. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 175–195.
Carlile, L. E. and Tilton, M. C. (eds.) (1998) Is Japan Really Changing Its Ways? Regulatory Reform and the Japanese Economy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.
Castellano, F. L. and García-Quero, F. (2012) “Institutional Approaches to Economic Development: The Current Status of the Debate,” Journal of Economic Issues, 46(4), pp. 921–940. doi: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624460405.
Castro, P. G. de, Fernandes, E. A. and Campos, A. C. (2013) “The determinants of foreign direct investment in Brazil and Mexico: an empirical analysis,” Procedia Economics and Finance, 5, pp. 231–240.
Chang, H.-J. (1997) “The economics and politics of regulation,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21, pp. 703–728.
Chang, H.-J. (2003) Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspecitve. London: Anthem Press.
Cherif, R. and Hasanov, F. (2019) The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be Named: Principles of Industrial Policy. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2019/03/26/The-Return-of-the-Policy-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named-Principles-of-Industrial-Policy-46710.
Coglianese, C. and Carrigan, C. (2012) “Oversight in Hindsight: Assessing the U.S. Regulatory System in the Wake of Calamity,” in Regulatory Breakdown: The Crisis of Confidence in U.S. Regulation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1–20.
Colander, D. (2005) “The Making of an Economist Redux,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), pp. 175–198.
Cunha, B. Q., Pereira, A. K. and Gomide, A. A. (2017) “State Capacity and Utilities Regulation in Brazil: Exploring Bureuacracy,” Utilities Policy, 49, pp. 116–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2017.06.004.
Cypher, J. M. (2015) “The Origins of Developmentalist Theory,” International Journal of Political Economy, 43(4), pp. 15–32. doi: 10.1080/08911916.2014.1002700.
Davis, K. E. et al. (2012) Governance by Indicators: Global Power Through Quantification and Rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deeg, R. (2005) “Change from Within: German and Italian Finance in the 1990s,” in Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. A. (eds.) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 169–202.
Dubash, N. K. and Morgan, B. (eds.) (2013) The Rise of the Regulatory State of the South: Infrastructure and Development in Emerging Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eriksen, A. (2020) “Political Values in Independent Agencies,” Regulation & Governance, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1111/rego.12299.
Estache, A. and Wren-Lewis, L. (2009) “Toward a Theory of Regulation for Developing Countries: Following Jean-Jacques Laffont’s Lead,” Journal of Economic Literature, 47(3), pp. 729–770. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.3.729.
Evans, P. (1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1177/1070496507309112.
Evans, P. (2010) “Constructing the 21st century developmental state: Potentialities and pitfalls,” in Edigheji, O. (ed.) Constructing a democratic developmental state in South Africa: Potentials and challenges. Cape Town: HSRC Press, pp. 37–58.
Freeman, C. (1996) “The Greening of Technology and Models of Innovation,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53, pp. 27–39.
Furtado, C. (1983) Teoria e Política do Desenvolvimento Econômico. São Paulo: Abril.
Gala, P., Rocha, I. and Magacho, G. (2018) “The structuralist revenge: economic complexity as an important dimension to evaluate growth and development,” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 38(2), pp. 219–236. doi: 10.1590/0101-31572018V38N02A01.
Gerschenkron, A. (1962) Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Bellknap.
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2001) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hanusch, H. and Pyka, A. (2007) “Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian Economics,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31, pp. 275–289. doi: 10.1093/cje/bel018.
Hirschman, A. O. (1958) The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hodgson, G. M. (2005) “Institutions and Economic Development: Constraining, Enabling and Reconstituting,” in De Paula, S. and Dymski, G. A. (eds.) Reimagining Growth: Towards a Renewal of Development Theory. London: Zed Books, pp. 85–98.
Jadhav, P. (2012) “Determinants of foreign direct investment in BRICS economies: Analysis of economic, institutional and political factor,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 37, pp. 5–14.
Jarvis, D. S. L. (2012) “The Regulatory State in Developing Countries: Can It Exist and Do We Want It? The Case of the Indonesian Power Sector,” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42(3), pp. 464–492. doi: 10.1080/00472336.2012.687633.
Jarvis, D. S. L. (2017) “The OECD and the Reconfiguration of the State in Emerging Economies: Manufacturing ‘Regulatory Capacity,’” Development and Change, 48(6), pp. 1386–1416. doi: 10.1111/dech.12343.
Jayasuriya, K. (2001) “Globalization and the changing architecture of the state: the regulatory state and the politics of negative co-ordination,” Journal of European Public Policy, 8(February 2015), pp. 101–123. doi: 10.1080/1350176001001859.
Jo, T. (2016) “Heterodox Microeconomics and Heterodox Microfoundations,” in Jo, T. and Todorova, Z. (eds.) Advancing the Frontiers of Heterodox Economics: essays in honor of Frederic S. Lee. London: Routledge, pp. 97–114.
Kim, E. (1997) Big Business, Strong State: collusion and conflict in South Korean Development, 1960-1990. New York: State University of New York Press.
Koppell, J. G. S. (2010) World rule: accountability, legitimacy, and the design of global governance. University of Chicago Press.
Krugman, P. R. (1995) “The Fall and Rise of Development Economics,” in Development, Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, pp. 1–30.
te Kulve, H. et al. (2018) “Influencing the Direction of Innovation Processes: the shadow of authorities in demand articulation,” Science and Public Policy, 45(4), pp. 455–467. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scy015.
Lee, F. and Cronin, B. (2016) “Introduction,” in Lee, F. S. and Cronin, B. (eds.) Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Heterodox Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.4337/9781782548461.
Lee, F. S. and Keen, S. (2004) “The Incoherent Emperor: A Heterodox Critique of Neoclassical Microeconomic Theory,” Review of Social Economy, LXII(2 (June)), pp. 169–199. doi: 10.1080/00346760410001684433.
Levi-Faur, D. (2005) “The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), pp. 12–32. doi: 10.1177/0002716204272371.
Levi-Faur, D. (2013) “The Odyssey of the Regulatory State: From a ‘Thin’ Monomorphic Concept to a ‘Thick’ and Polymorphic Concept,” Law and Policy, 35(1–2), pp. 29–50. doi: 10.1111/lapo.12000.
Levy, B. and Spiller, P. T. (eds.) (1996) Regulations, Institutions, and Commitment: Comparative Studies of Telecommunications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Levy, J. D. (2005) “Redeploying the State: Liberalization and Social Policy in France,” in Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. A. (eds.) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political EconomiesInstitutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 103–126.
Lodge, M. (2014) “Regulatory Capacity,” in Lodge, M. and Wegrich, K. (eds.) The Problem-Solving Capacity of the Modern State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–85.
Lodge, M. and Wegrich, K. (2014) “Setting the Scene: Challenges to the State, Governance Readiness, and Administrative Capacities,” in Hertie School of Governance (ed.) The Governance Report 2014. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 15–26.
Lodge, M. and Wegrich, K. (2016) “The Rationality Paradox of Nudge: Rational Tools of Government in a World of Bounded Rationality,” Law & Policy, 38(3), pp. 250–267. doi: 10.1111/lapo.12056.
Mann, M. (1993) The Sources of Social Power: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760-1914, V. II. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Martinez-Gallardo, C. and Murillo, M. V. (2011) “Agency under constraint: Ideological preferences and the politics of electricity regulation in Latin America,” Regulation & Governance, 5(3), pp. 350–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01114.x.
Mazzucato, M. (2013) The Entrepreneurial State. London: Anthem Press.
Mazzucato, M. (2018) “Mission-oriented Innovation Policies: challenges and opportunities,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), pp. 803–815.
Mazzucato, M. (2021) Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism. New York: Harper Business.
Mazzucato, M. (2023) Innovation-driven inclusive and sustainable growth: challenges and opportunities for Brazil. London. Available at: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/publications/2023/dec/challenges-and-opportunities-brazil?utm_source=UK+elections_+Missions+%26+Wealth+Fund+mailout&utm_campaign=885b866779-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_newsletter_oct_2021_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=.
Mazzucato, M. and Penna, C. C. R. (2015) The Rise of Mission-Oriented State Investment Banks: The Cases of Germany’s KfW and Brazil’s BNDES. 26.
Miller, E. S. and Samuels, W. J. (2002) “Introduction,” in Miller, E. S. and Samuels, W. J. (eds.) An Institutional Approach to Public Utilities Regulation. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University Press, pp. 1–16.
Moloney, K. and Stone, D. (2019) “Beyond the State: Global Policy and Transnational Administration,” International Review of Public Policy. International Public Policy Association, 1(1), pp. 104–118. doi: 10.4000/irpp.344.
Naseemullah, A. (2023) “The political economy of national development: a research agenda after neoliberal reform?,” World Development, 168, pp. 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106269.
Nisar, M. A. (2020) “Practitioner as the Imaginary Father of Public Administration: A Psychoanalytic Critique,” Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(1), pp. 44–61. doi: 10.1080/10841806.2019.1589230.
Ocampo, J. A., Rada, C. and Taylor, L. (2009) Growth and Policy in Developing Countries: A Structuralist Approach. New York: Columbia University Press.
Phillips, N. (2006) “States and modes of regulation in the global political economy,” in Minogue, M. and Cariño, L. (eds.) Regulatory Governance in Developing Countries. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 17–38.
Power, M. (1999) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prosser, T. (1999) “Theorising Utility Regulation,” The Modern Law Review, 62(2), pp. 196–217. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00201.
Reinert, E. S., Ghosh, J. and Kattel, R. (2016) “Introduction,” in Reinert, E. S., Ghosh, J., and Kattel, R. (eds.) Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. xiii–xxxiv.
Rostow, W. W. (1960) The Stages of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schrank, A. (2013) “Rewarding Regulation in Latin America,” Politics & Society, 41(4), pp. 487–495. doi: 10.1177/0032329213507549.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1987) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.
Selwyn, B. (2014) The Global Development Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Shadlen, K. C. and Fonseca, E. M. da (2013) “Health Policy as Industrial Policy,” Politics & Society, 41(4), pp. 561–587. doi: 10.1177/0032329213507552.
Skocpol, T., Evans, P. B. and Rueschemeyer, D. (eds.) (1985) Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Svara, J. H. (2001) “The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration,” Public Administration Review, 61(2), pp. 176–183. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00020.
Thatcher, M. (2008) “Reforming National Regulatory Institutions: the EU and Cross-National Variety in European Network Industries,” in Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., and Thatcher, M. (eds.) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–172.
Thurbon, E. (2016) Developmental Mindset: The Revival of Financial Activism in South Korea. Ithaca, Estados Unidos: Cornell University Press.
Trubek, D. M. et al. (2014) Law and the New Developmental State: The Brazilian Experience in Latin American Context. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press.
Wade, R. (2003) “What Strategies Are Viable for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of ‘Development Space,’” Review of International Political Economy, 10(4), pp. 621–644. doi: 10.1080/09692290310001601902.
Weiss, L. (2012) “The Myth of the Neoliberal State,” in Kyung-Sup, C., Fine, B., and Weiss, L. (eds.) Developmental Politics in Transition: the neoliberal era and beyond. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 27–42.
Williamson, O. E. (2000) “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead,” Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3 (Sep. 2000)), pp. 595–613.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista do Serviço Público
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
- A RSP adota a licença Creative Commons (CC) do tipo Atribuição – Uso Não-Comercial (BY-NC).
- A licença permite que outros remixem, adaptem e criem obra licenciada, sendo proibido o uso com fins comerciais.
- As novas obras devem fazer referência ao autor nos créditos e não podem ser usadas com fins comerciais, porém não precisam ser licenciadas sob os mesmos termos dessa licença.
- Ao publicar o artigo na RSP, o autor cede e transfere para a ENAP os direitos autorais patrimoniais referentes ao artigo.
- O artigo publicado na RSP não poderá ser divulgado em outro meio sem a devida referência à publicação de origem.
- O autor que tiver o artigo publicado na RSP deverá assinar o Termo de Concessão de Direitos Autorais (em momento oportuno a editoria da Revista entrará em contato com o autor para assinatura do Termo).
