Inovação orientada por missão

perspectivas para o setor público a partir de revisão de literatura

Autores

  • Maria Lúcia Corrêa Neves Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) 0000-0002-1987-4707
  • Julieta Kaoru Watanabe-Wilbert Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) 0000-0003-1522-5504
  • Andreia De Bem Machado Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) 0000-0002-4404-0341
  • Gertrudes Aparecida Dandolini Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) 0000-0003-0867-9495
  • João Artur De Souza Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) 0000-0002-7133-8944

Palavras-chave:

inovação, inovação orientada por missão, wicked problems

Resumo

O construto ‘inovação orientada por missão’ (IOM) emerge em contextos diversos com distintas abordagens. O objetivo deste trabalho é compreender esse construto no contexto acadêmico, e para isso, realizou-se uma revisão de escopo na base Scopus. O resultado revela uma lacuna de conceito sistematizado de IOM, mas identificaram-se concepções distintas, categorizadas de acordo com a ênfase dada: estratégia da Pesquisa, Desenvolvimento e Inovação; processo de inovação; inovação aberta; e alvo (p. ex., wicked problems).  Os autores concluem que o IOM é um campo transdisciplinar e o artigo propõe um conceito de IOM, destacando a singularidade que a distingue de outros tipos de inovação: IOM requer a congregação de diferentes atores em torno de missões. Embora reconhecendo a importância da participação do setor privado, a pesquisa sugere que a IOM possui forte aderência à inovação do setor público, por ser um coordenador e integrador de conhecimento para enfrentar os importantes desafios do século atual.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Maria Lúcia Corrêa Neves, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Doutora em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Bacharel em Engenharia civil pela Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. Mestre em Gestão e produção agroindustrial pela Universidade para o Desenvolvimento do Estado e da Região do Pantanal UNIDERP (MS). Em estágio pós-doutoral na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina no Núcleo em Inteligência, Gestão e Tecnologia para Inovação – IGTI.

Julieta Kaoru Watanabe-Wilbert, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Doutora e Mestre em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC), Mestre em Administração Pública (Academia de Speyer, Alemanha) e Andragogia (Universidade Strasbourg II, França), MBA em Gestão da Qualidade (FNQ/SENAI). Pesquisadora associada do Núcleo de Inteligência, Gestão e Tecnologia para Inovação, Departamento de Engenharia do Conhecimento (UFSC).

 

Andreia De Bem Machado, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Pós-doutora e Doutora em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento, Mestre em Educação Científica e Tecnológica pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Graduada em Pedagogia pela Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC). Professora da Faculdade Anasps. Pesquisadora no Núcleo de Estudos em Inteligência, Gestão e Tecnologias para Inovação (IGTI), da UFSC.

Gertrudes Aparecida Dandolini, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Doutora e Mestre em Engenharia de Produção, e licenciada em Matemática pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Professora titular da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina do Departamento de Engenharia do Conhecimento e pesquisadora no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento em inovação e gestão do conhecimento e transição para sustentabilidade.

 

João Artur De Souza, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Pós-doutor e doutor em Engenharia de Produção e Bacharel e Mestre em Matemática pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Bacharel em Direito pela Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UniSul). Professor titular do Departamento de Engenharia do Conhecimento e Pesquisador no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento em inovação e tecnologias, da UFSC.

Referências

AGARWAL, Rajshree; MOEEN, Mahka; SHAH, Sonali K. Athena's Birth: Triggers, Actors, and Actions. Preceding Industry Inception, v.11, n. 3, p. 287-305, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1259

AMANATIDOU, Effie; CUNNINGHAM, Paul; GÖK, Abdullah; GAREFI, Ioanna. Using Evaluation Research as a Means for Policy Analysis in a ‘New’ Mission-Oriented Policy Context. Minerva, v. 52,

p. 419-438, 2014. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11024-014-9258-x

BEKKERS, Victor; EDELENBOS, Jurian; STEIJN, Bram. Innovation in the public sector: linking capacity and leadership. New York: Palgrave, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307520

BERGEK, Anna; HELLSMARK, Hans; KARLTOP, Kerstin. Directionality challenges for transformative innovation policy: lessons from implementing climate goals in the process industry. Industry and Innovation, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2163882

BOORMAN, Cathy; JACKSON, Brad; BRUKETT, Ingrid. SDG localization: Mobilizing the Potential of Place Leadership Through Collective Impact and Mission-Oriented Innovation Methodologies. Journal of Change Management: Reframing Leadership and Organizational Practice, v. 23, n.1, p. 53-71, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2023.2167226

BORJA, Mario Bazan. Toward interregional innovation systems in Peru. Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, v. 20, n. 4, p. 380-395, 2022. https://doi.org /10.1108/MRJIAM-07-2021-1210

BONVILLIAN, William B. DARPA and its ARPA-E and IARPA clones: a unique innovation organization model. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 27, n. 5, p. 897–914, 2018. https://doi.org /10.1093/icc/dty026

BUSCH, Jonathan; FOXON, Timothy J.; TAYLOR, Peter G. Designing industrial strategy for a low carbon transformation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 29, p. 114-125, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.07.005

CANTNER, Uwe; VANNUCCINI, Simone. Elements of a Schumpeterian catalytic research and innovation policy. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 27, n.5, p. 833-850, 2018. University of Sussex. https://hdl.handle.net/10779/uos.23462843.v1

CAPPELLANO, Francesco; KUROWSKA-PYSZ, Joanna. The mission-oriented approach for (cross-border) regional development. Sustainability, v.12; n. 12, p. 5181, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125181

CAVALCANTE, Pedro Luiz Costa; CAMÕES, Marizaura Reis de Souza. Inovação pública no Brasil: uma visão geral de seus tipos, resultados e indutores. Inovação no setor público. Teoria, tendências e casos no Brasil. Enap, Ipea, 2017.

CELIS, Julio E., HEITOR, Manuel. Towards a mission-oriented approach to cancer in Europe: an unmet need in cancer research policy. Molecular Oncology, v. 13, n. 3, p. 502-510, 2019. https://doi.org /10.1002/1878-0261.12452

CHEN, Jiao; WALKER, Richard M.; SAWHNEY, Mohanbir. Public service innovation: a typology. Public Management Review, v. 22, n. 11, p. 1674-1695, 2020. https://doi.org 10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874

CHIANG, Jong-Tsong. From 'mission-oriented' to 'diffusion-oriented' paradigm: the new trend of U.S. industrial technology policy. Technovation, v.11, n.6, p. 339-356, 1991.

CHIANG, Jong-Tsong. Technological spin-off - its mechanisms and national contexts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v.41, p. 365-390, 1992.

CHICOT, Julien.; MATT, Mireille. Public procurement of innovation: A review of rationales, designs, and contributions to grand challenges. Science and Public Policy, v. 45, n.4, p. 480–492, 2018. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scy012

DIERCKS, Gijs. Lost in translation: How legacy limits the OECD in promoting new policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, v. 48, n. 10, p. 103667, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.002

DJELLAL, Faridah.; GALLOUJ, Faïz; MILES, Ian. Two decades of research on innovation in services: which place for public services? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, v. 27, p. 98-117, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.005

DOBLINGER, Claudia; SURANA, Kavita; LI, Deyu; HULTMAN, Nathan; ANADÓN, Laura Diaz How do global manufacturing shifts affect long-term clean energy innovation? A study of wind energy suppliers. Reseach Policy, v. 51, pp. 1- 26, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104558

EASTWOOD, C. R.; KNOOK, J.; TURNER, J. A.; RENWICK, A. Policy approaches for enhanced daity sector innovation – a review of futue pathways and policies for effective implementation of digital agriculture. New Zealand Economic Papers, 2023, https://doi.og/10.1080/00779954.2022.2161935.

FIELKE, Simon J.; LACEY, Justine; JAKKU, Emma; ... COOKE, Alexander. From a land ‘down under’: the potential role of responsible innovation as practice during the bottom-up development of mission arenas in Autralia. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2142393.

FORAY, Dominique. Smart specialization strategies as a case of mission-oriented policy-a case study

on the emergence of new policy practices. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 27, n.5, p. 817–832, 2018. doi: 10.1093/icc/dty030

GEELS, Frank W.; ELZEN, Boelie; GREEN, Kate. General introduction: system innovation and transitions to sustainability. System innovation and the transition to sustainability, v. 1, n. 16, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845423421

HEIKE, D.; HEKKERT, M. P.; NEGRO, S.O. Understanding circular economy transitions: The case of circular textiles, Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 32, n. 3, p. 1032-1058, 2023 https://doi.org /10.1002/bse.3114

HEKKERT, Marco P.; JANSSEN, Matthijs J.; WESSELING, Joeri H..; NEGRO, Simona O. Mission-oriented innovation systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 34, p. 76-79, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.011

HJALAGER, Anne-Mette.; VON GESSENECK, Milan Jezic. Capacity-, system- and mission-oriented innovation policies in tourism–characteristics, measurement, and prospects. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, v.12, n.2, p. 197-216, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2019.1605609

JÜTTING, Malte. Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology. Sustainability, v. 12, p. 1-28, 2020. https://doi.org /10.3390/su12166677

KALTENBRUNNER, Wolfgang. Managing budgetary uncertainty, interpreting policy. How researchers integrate “grand challenges” funding programs into their research agendas, Journal of Responsible Innovation, v. 7, n.3, p. 320-341, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1744401

KATTEL, Rainer., MAZZUCATO, Mariana. Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 27, n.5, p. 787-801, 2018. https://doi.org /10.1093/icc/dty032

KATTEL, Rainer; CEPILOVS, Aleksandrs.; DRECHSLER, Wolfgang; KALVET, Tarmo; LEMBER, Veiko; TÕNURIST, Piret. Can we measure public sector innovation? A literature reviews. Lipse Project paper, v. 6, n.2, 2013.

KLERKX, Laurens, BEGEMANN, Stephanie Supporting food systems transformation: The what, why, who, where and how of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural Systems, v. 184, art. no. 102901, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901

KLERKX, Laurens, ROSE, David. Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? Global Food Security, v. 24, art. no. 100347, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100347

KLERKX, Laurens; TURNER, James; PERCY, Helen. Navigating the rapids of agrifoodsystems transformation: reflections on Aotearoa New Zealand’s emerging mission-oriented agrifood innovation system. New Zealand Economic Papers, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2022.2158489

LARRUE, Philippe. The design and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies: A new systemic policy approach to address societal challenges, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, no. 100, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/3f6c76a4-en

LEE, Sang; M.; HWANG, Taewon; CHOI, Donghyun. Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries. Management decision, 2012. https://doi.org /10.1108/00251741211194921

MAZZUCATO, Mariana. From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, v. 23, n. 2, p. 140-156, 2016 https://doi.org /10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124

MAZZUCATO, Mariana. Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 27, n.5, p. 803–815, 2018. https://doi.org /10.1093/icc/dty034

MAZZUCATO, Mariana. O Estado empreendedor. Desmascarando o mito do setor público vs. setor privado. São Paulo: Portfolio-Pinguin, 2014.

MAZZUCATO, Mariana; KATTEL, Rainer; RYAN-COLLINS, Josh. Challenge-Driven Innovation Policy: Towards a New Policy Toolkit. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, v. 20, n. 2, p. 421–437, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00329-w

MAZZUCATO, Mariana; SEMIENIUK, Gregor. Public financing of innovation: new questions. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, v. 33, n. 1, p. 24–48, 2017. https://doi.org /10.1093/oxrep/grw036

MAZZUCATO, Mariana; PENNA, Caetano C. R. Beyond market failures: The market creating and shaping roles of state investment banks. Journal of economic policy reform, v. 19, n. 4, p. 305-326, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2016.1216416

MOWERY, David C. Defense-related R&D as a model for "grand Challenges" technology policies. Research Policy, v. 41, n. 19, p. 1703-1715, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.027

MUNN , Zachary; PETERS, Micah D.J.; STERN, Cindy; TUFANARU, Catalin; MCARTHUR, Alexa; AROMATARIS, Edoardo. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach, BMC Medical Research Methodology, v. 18, p. 143-150, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

NATURE. Researchers should reach beyond the science bubble. Nature, v. 542, n. 391, 21Feb. 2017. Disponível em:< https://www.nature.com/news/researchers-should-reach-beyondthe-science-bubble-1.21514>. Acesso em: 02 fev. 2021. https://doi.org /10.1038/542391a

OCDE - ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Declaration on Public Sector Innovation, 2019. Disponível em https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0450. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2022.

OCDE - ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Tackling policy challenges through public sector innovation: a strategic portfolio approach. OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1787/052b06b7-en

OCDE - ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. The innovation imperative in the public sector: setting an agenda for action. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264236561-en

OPSI - OBSERVATORY OF PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION. Innovation is a many-splendoured thing. OECD, 2018. Disponível em: < https://oecd-opsi.org/blog/innovation-is-a-many-splendoured-thing/>. Acesso em 04 fev. 2021.

PARKS, Darcy. Directionality in transformative innovation policy: who is giving directions? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 43, p. 1-13, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.02.005

PIMENTA-BUENO, J.; CORRÊA, R. T. S. A new look at the US pattern of federal R&D spending: preliminary lessons for newly industrializing economies. Technovation, v. 13, n. 2, p. 101-107, 1993.

POEL, Ibo Van De. The transformation of technological regimes. Research Policy, v. 32, n. 1, p. 49-68, 2003.

RAINVILLE, Anne. Green Public Procurement in Mission-Orientated Innovation Systems: Leveraging Voluntary Standards to Improve Sustainability Performance of Municipalities. Sustainability, v. 14, p. 1-22, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148591

REALE, Filippo. Mission-oriented innovation policy and the challenge of urgency: Lessons from Covid-19 and beyond. Technovation, 107, art. N. 102306, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102306

RICKARDS, Tudor. Making new things happen: an interpretation of observed innovation strategies. Technovation, v. 3, n. 2, p. 119-131, 1985.

ROBERTS, Patrick S.; SCHMID, Jon. Government-led innovation acceleration: Case studies of US

federal government innovation and technology acceleration organizations. Review of Policy

Research, v. 39, p. 353-378, 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12474

SCHUMPETER, John Alois. The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Nova Brunsvique: Transaction Publishers, 1934.

SMITH, John K.; HOUNSHELL, David A. Wallace H. carothers and fundamental research at Du Pont, Science, v. 229, n. 4712, p. 436-442, 1985.

SONNIER, E.; GRIT, A. A narrative for circular economy in Cities: Conditions for a Mission-Oriented innovative system. City and Environment Interactions, v. 16, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacint.2022.100084.

SOE, Ralf-Martin; SARV, Lill; GASCO-HERNANDEZ, Mila. Systematic Mapping of Long-Term Urban Challenges. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 817, p. 1-12, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020817

STEVENS, Candice. The Knowledge-driven Economy, The OECD Observer, v.2, p. 6–10, 1996.

TÖDTLING, Franz; TRIPPL, Michaela; DESCH, Veronika. New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges. European Planning Studies, v. 30, n. 11, p. 2139-2156, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1951177

TRICCO, Andrea C.; LILLIE, Erin; ZARIN, Wasifa; ... STRAUS, Sharon E. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Interne Medicine, v. 169, n.7, p. 467-473, 2018.

VARMA, Roli. Changing Research Cultures in U.S. Industry. Science, Technology & Human Values, v. 25, n. 4, p. 395-416, 2000.

ZAPATA-CANTU, Laura; GONZÁLEZ, Fernando. Challenges for innovation and sustainable development in Latin America: the significance of institutions and human capital. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 7, p. 4077, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13074077

WEHN, Uta; MONTALVO, Carlos. Exploring the dynamics of water innovation: Foundations for water innovation studies, Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 171, p. 1-19, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.118

Downloads

Publicado

2023-12-21

Como Citar

Corrêa Neves, M. L. ., Watanabe-Wilbert, J. K., De Bem Machado, A., Dandolini, G. A., & De Souza, J. A. . (2023). Inovação orientada por missão: perspectivas para o setor público a partir de revisão de literatura. Revista Do Serviço Público, 74(4), 869 - 889. Recuperado de https://revista.enap.gov.br/index.php/RSP/article/view/10008

Edição

Seção

Artigos