Perceptions on performance management in the public sector

Authors

Keywords:

performance management, performance evaluation, strategy, research

Abstract

Performance management is a recurrent theme in public administration, however, there are vagueness about its applicability. Thus, a survey was conducted to identify how public management professionals perceive concepts of "performance," "performance management," "performance evaluation," and, map management practices. Six points were identified, namely, 1) the perception of managers is multidimensional and multidetermined; 2) performance management requires clarity of rules and leadership; 3) strategy, Information Technology and people management are the bases of the model; 4) between the individual and the group the focus should be on the latter; 5) mitigating problems between the individual and institutional perspectives requires strategic direction; and, 6) the challenges to assess performance are the low quality of leadership, non-meritocratic culture, gaming and bureaucratization. These results combined with good practices collaborate to a performance management model with public value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Renata Vilhena, Fundação Dom Cabral

Lato Sensu Specialist in Public Management and Urban Legislation at Universidade Cândido Mendes (UCAM). Professor at Fundação Dom Cabral (FDC). Author of several national and international works. He is member of the FDC Advanced Management Network in partnership with INSEAD Businesses School

Humberto Martins, Fundação Dom Cabral

Ph.D in Business Administration at Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV). Professor at Fundação Dom Cabral (FDC). In the last 35 years he has combined academic activities (EBAPE/FGV, EAESP/FGV, UnB, IDP, ENSP/France, York University/Canada and LSE/UK) with positions in the public sector and consulting.

References

ASSIS, L.O. M.; NETO, M.T.R. Remuneração variável por desempenho no setor público: investigação das causas do fracasso e implicações para o Estado brasileiro. V Anais...Congresso CONSAD de Gestão Pública. Painel 006/021. 2012.

BEHN, Robert. Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), p.586-600, 2003.

BEHN, R. On the limitations of pay for performance. Public Management Report, 1(5) January 2004.

BRASIL. Câmara dos Deputados. Projeto de Emenda à Constituição n. 32/2020. Altera disposições sobre servidores, empregados públicos e organização administrativa. Disponível em:

https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/prop_mostrarintegra;jsessionid=node01rtcmf5ej4rx61aisao2d016aa43692274.node0?codteor=1928147&filename=PEC+32/2020, Acesso em 10 de fevereiro de 2022.

FUNDAÇÃO LEMANN; DATAFOLHA. Opinião dos brasileiros sobre funcionalismo público e lideranças. Julho a agosto de 2021.

Disponível em: https://movimentopessoasafrente.org.br/campanhas/brasileiros-defendem-competencia-como-principal-criterio-para-cargos-de-lideranca-no-servico-publico/

HAIR JR., J.F.; WILLIAM, B.; BABIN, B.; ANDERSON, R.E. Análise multivariada de dados. 6.ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2009.

KRUSKAL, W.H.; WALLIS, W.A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, v.47, n.260, p.538-621, 1952.

WHITTINGTON, R. The work of strategizing and organizing for a practice perspective. Strategic Organization, London, UK, v.1, n.1, p.119-127, Fev. 2002c.

Published

2022-07-18

How to Cite

Vilhena, R., & Martins, H. . (2022). Perceptions on performance management in the public sector. Revista Do Serviço Público, 73(a), 8-25. Retrieved from https://revista.enap.gov.br/index.php/RSP/article/view/6864