Multisectoral collaboration for the development and maintenance of participatory technology solutions
the case of Brasil Participativo
Keywords:
Digital Participation, Open Source, Brasil Participativo, Multisector Collaboration.Abstract
One of the challenges of formulating and consolidating digital participation policies lies in the arrangements and processes for developing and maintaining digital tools. The arrangements between stakeholders in multisectoral collaboration processes, called Open Source and Public Sector Collaboration, provide the basis for observing initiatives to build open tools. Based on that, this article reflects on multisectoral arrangements in developing and maintaining digital tools based on the creation process of the Brasil Participativo digital platform, an initiative of the Brazilian federal government. We adopted the observational study methodology, in which the authors actively participated in constructing the platform. We analyzed the data collected during the platform design and its use in the participatory Multi-Year Plan process. The joint work of these institutions delivered a consolidated structure that engaged more than 1 million 400 thousand people and 8,254 proposals in 2 months. The analysis mapped the multisectoral arrangement of Participatory Brazil, involving different actors and sectors organized into four facets: Governance, Technology, Community and Resources. The innovative and effective structure applied in the development process of Participatory Brazil offers the possibility of reproduction by different government digital tool projects.
Downloads
References
ALMADA, M. P. et al. Democracia digital no Brasil: obrigação legal, pressão política e viabilidade tecnológica. MATRIZes, v. 13, n. 3, p. 161–181, 26 dez. 2019.
ARP, L. et al. It Takes a Village: Open Source Software Sustainability. 1 Jan. 2018.
AVELINO, Daniel Pitangueira de; POMPEU, João Cláudio Basso ; FONSECA, Igor Ferraz da. Democracia digital : mapeamento de experiências em dados abertos, governo digital e ouvidorias públicas. http://www.ipea.gov.br, 2021. Disponível em: <https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/10440>. Acesso em: 28 set. 2023.
AVRITZER, L.; KERCHE, F.; MARONA, M. Governo Bolsonaro: retrocesso democrático e degradação política. [s.l.] Autêntica Editora, 2021.
BASTOS DOS SANTOS, J. G. et al. WhatsApp, política mobile e desinformação: a hidra nas eleições presidenciais de 2018. Comunicação & Sociedade, v. 41, n. 2, p. 307, 31 ago. 2019.
BAZILIOL, Jennifer et al. Gerando conversas significativas: World Café no planejamento estratégico interprofissional em Educação Permanente. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, Brasília, v. 73, n. 5, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/reben/a/JKtm8NBzmN7WNZnnQqKBgpw/?format=pdf&lang= pt. Acesso em: 04 ago. 2023.
BEZERRA, C. DE P. Why do political parties promote participatory governance? The Brazilian Workers’ Party case. Critical Policy Studies, p. 1–23, 20 jan. 2022.
BRAGA, S. S. Podem as novas tecnologias de informação e comunicação auxiliar na consolidação das democracias? Um estudo sobre a informatização dos órgãos legislativos na América do Sul. Opinião Pública, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1–50, jun. 2007.
BRELÀZ, Gabriela De; CRANTSCHANINOV, Tamara Ilinsky ; BELLIX, Laila. Open Government Partnership in São Paulo City and the São Paulo Aberta program: challenges in the diffusion and institutionalization of a global policy. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, v. 19, p. 123–137, 2021.
DAHLBERG, L. The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere. Information, Communication & Society, v. 4, n. 4, p. 615–633, Jan. 2001.
DENTERS, S. A. H.; ROSE, L. E. Comparing Local Governance. Trends and Developments. [s.l.] Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
EDMONDS, W. A.; KENNEDY, T. D. An Applied Guide to Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. [s.l.] SAGE Publications, 2016.
FERRARA, Emilio et al. The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, v. 59, n. 7, p. 96-104, 2016.
FREY, Rasmus. How We Lead Successful Open-Source Collaborations in the Danish Public Sector. IEEE Software, v. 40, n. 4, p. 19-24, 2023.
GIL-GARCIA, J. Ramon; GASCO-HERNANDEZ, Mila; PARDO, Theresa A. Beyond transparency, participation, and collaboration? A reflection on the dimensions of open government. Public Performance & Management Review, v. 43, n. 3, p. 483-502, 2020.
GOMES, W. DEMOCRACIA DIGITAL: QUE DEMOCRACIA? [s.l: s.n.]. Disponível em: <http://compolitica.org/novo/anais/2007_gt_ip-wilson.pdf>
KON, F. O Software Aberto e a Questão Social. São Paulo: USP, 2001. Disponível em: <http://gsd.ime.usp.br> . Acesso em: 28 set. 2023.
KON, F. et al. Free and Open Source Software Development and Research: Opportunities for Software Engineering. 1 set. 2011. Disponível em: <https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6065149>. Acesso em: 28 set. 2023.
LIM, S.; OH, Y. Online Versus Offline Participation: Has the Democratic Potential of the Internet Been Realized? Analysis of a Participatory Budgeting System in Korea. Public Performance & Management Review, v. 39, n. 3, p. 676–700, 23 mar. 2016.
LINÅKER, Johan et al. Open Source Software in the Public Sector: 25 years and still in its infancy. IEEE Software, v. 40, n. 4, p. 39-44, 2023.
MAGALHÃES, Inês; BARRETO, Luiz; TREVAS, Vicente. Governo e cidadania: balanço e reflexões sobre o modo petista de governar, 1999.
PARISER, Eli. The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. Penguin, 2011.
PINHO, J. A. G. DE. Investigando portais de governo eletrônico de estados no Brasil: muita tecnologia, pouca democracia. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 42, n. 3, p. 471–493, jun. 2008.
PITANGUEIRA DE AVELINO, D.; FERRAZ DA FONSECA, I.; BASSO POMPEU, J. C. Políticas Públicas de Democracia Digital no Governo Federal: individualização da cidadania? fevereiro de 2021, n. 25, p. 43–48, 25 fev. 2021.
ROBBINS, M. D.; SIMONSEN, B.; FELDMAN, B. Citizens and Resource Allocation: Improving Decision Making with Interactive Web-Based Citizen Participation. Public Administration Review, v. 68, n. 3, p. 564–575, maio 2008.
ROTHBERG, Danilo. Democracia digital e redes sociais: Twitter como filtro de informação política. In: E-Compós. 2014.
SÆBØ, Ø.; ROSE, J.; SKIFTENES FLAK, L. The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, v. 25, n. 3, p. 400–428, jul. 2008.
SCOTT, J. K. “E” the People: Do U.S. Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement?. Public Administration Review, v. 66, n. 3, p. 341–353, maio 2006.
SIQUEIRA, Rodrigo; CAMARINHA, Diego; WEN, Melissa; et al. Continuous Delivery: Building Trust in a Large-Scale, Complex Government Organization. IEEE Software, v. 35, n. 2, p. 38–43, 2018.
TAT‐KEI HO, A. Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government Initiative. Public Administration Review, v. 62, n. 4, p. 434–444, jan. 2002.
TUCKER, Joshua A. et al. Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature, 2018.
VISEUR, Robert; JULLIEN, Nicolas. CommunesPlone, an original open-source model of resource pooling in the public sector. IEEE Software, p. 2-10, 2023.
WIRTZ, B. W.; DAISER, P.; BINKOWSKA, B. E-participation: A Strategic Framework. International Journal of Public Administration, v. 41, n. 1, p. 1–12, 8 nov. 2016.
YIN, ROBERT K. Case study research and applications. Sage, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista do Serviço Público
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- A RSP adota a licença Creative Commons (CC) do tipo Atribuição – Uso Não-Comercial (BY-NC).
- A licença permite que outros remixem, adaptem e criem obra licenciada, sendo proibido o uso com fins comerciais.
- As novas obras devem fazer referência ao autor nos créditos e não podem ser usadas com fins comerciais, porém não precisam ser licenciadas sob os mesmos termos dessa licença.
- Ao publicar o artigo na RSP, o autor cede e transfere para a ENAP os direitos autorais patrimoniais referentes ao artigo.
- O artigo publicado na RSP não poderá ser divulgado em outro meio sem a devida referência à publicação de origem.
- O autor que tiver o artigo publicado na RSP deverá assinar o Termo de Concessão de Direitos Autorais (em momento oportuno a editoria da Revista entrará em contato com o autor para assinatura do Termo).
