Metagovernança e Inteligência Artificial no setor público

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21874/e606pf49

Palavras-chave:

metagovernança, inteligência artificial, setor público

Resumo

A crescente demanda por inovação e eficiência tem impulsionado o uso de estratégias como a metagovernança e a Inteligência Artificial (IA) no setor público. No entanto, ainda são limitados os estudos que sistematizam os benefícios e os desafios associados à aplicação conjunta dessas abordagens. Objetivo: O objetivo foi mapear e analisar os principais benefícios e desafios relacionados à utilização da metagovernança e da IA na melhoria da governança e da tomada de decisão no setor público. Materiais e métodos: Trata-se de um Mapeamento Sistemático da Literatura (MSL) baseado no método Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome e Context (PICOC). As buscas foram realizadas na base Scopus, e a organização dos dados foi conduzida com o apoio da ferramenta Parsifal. A seleção e análise dos estudos seguiram o protocolo Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), resultando na inclusão de 22 artigos publicados entre 2014 e 2024. Resultados: Os achados indicam que a metagovernança e a IA são estratégias complementares na transformação digital do setor público, embora enfrentem barreiras como a opacidade algorítmica, a escassez de capacitação técnica e a ausência de regulamentação específica. Conclusão: A sinergia entre essas estratégias pode fortalecer a governança pública, promovendo decisões mais eficazes, transparentes e orientadas por evidências.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Rodrigo José Lima Almeida, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Palmas – TO, Brasil

    Doutorando em Governança e Transformação Digital, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT). Mestre em Gestão de Políticas Públicas e Segurança Social, Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia (UFRB). Servidor público do Estado do Tocantins.

  • Daniela Mascarenhas de Queiroz Trevisan, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Palmas – TO, Brasil

    Doutora e Mestre em Modelagem Computacional, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT). Professora permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Governança e Transformação Digital, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT). 

  • Leonardo de Andrade Carneiro, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Palmas – TO, Brasil

    Doutor em Desenvolvimento Regional, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT). Professor colaborador no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Governança e Transformação Digital, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT).  Membro do Conselho Superior de Ensino da Polícia Militar do Estado do Tocantins (PMTO).

  • Rafael Lima de Carvalho, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Palmas – TO, Brasil

    Doutor em Engenharia de Sistemas e Computação, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). Professor Adjunto, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT).

  • Gentil Veloso Barbosa, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Palmas – TO, Brasil

    Doutor em Engenharia de Sistemas e Computação, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). Professor, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT).

  • Valéria Perim da Cunha, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Palmas – TO, Brasil

    Doutoranda em Governança e Transformação Digital, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT). Mestre em Propriedade Intelectual e Transferência de Tecnologia para a Inovação, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT). 

Referências

AGU, S. U.; OKEKE, R. C.; IDIKE, A. N. Meta-governance and the metaphysics of political leadership in 21st century Africa: A focus on election administration in Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, v. 5, n. 9, p. 177–182, 2014. DOI: https://doi/org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n9p177

ALHOSANI, K.; ALHASHMI, S. M. Opportunities, challenges, and benefits of AI innovation in government services: a review. Discover Artificial Intelligence, v. 4, art. 18, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00111-w

ARNESEN, S.; BRODERSTAD, T. S.; FISHKIN, J. S.; JOHANNESSON, M. P.; SIU, A. Knowledge and support for AI in the public sector: a deliberative poll experiment. AI & Society, v. 40, p. 3573–3589, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02104-w

BARANDIARAN, X.; LUNA, A. Building the future of public policy in the basque country: Etorkizuna eraikiz, a metagovernance approach. Cogent Social Sciences, v. 4, n. 1, 1503072, 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1503072

BENCSIK, A. The Opportunities of Digitalisation in Public Administration with a Special Focus on the Use of Artificial Intelligence. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, v. 33, n. 2, p. 11-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.2.11-23

BERMAN, A.; DE FINE LICHT, K.; CARLSSON, V. Trustworthy AI in the public sector: An empirical analysis of a Swedish labor market decision-support system. Technology in Society, v. 76, 102471, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102471

BOOTH, A.; SUTTON, A.; PAPAIOANNOU, D. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. 2. ed. Los Angeles: Sage, 2016.

CAMPION, A.; GASCO-HERNANDEZ, M.; JANKIN MIKHAYLOV, S.; ESTEVE, M. Overcoming the Challenges of Collaboratively Adopting Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector. Social Science Computer Review, v. 40, n. 2, p. 462–477, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320979953

CORNELIUSSEN, H. G.; SEDDIGHI, G.; IQBAL, A.; ANDERSEN, R. Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector in Norway: AI Development as a Hop-on-Hop-off Journey. In: AKERKAR, R. (ed.). AI, Data, and Digitalization. Cham: Springer, 2024. p. 160–172. (Communications in Computer and Information Science, v. 1810). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53770-7_11

DAVIES, K. S. Formulating the Evidence Based Practice Question: A Review of the Frameworks. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, v. 6, n. 2, p. 75–80, 24 jun. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/B8WS5N

DELFOS, J.; ZUIDERWIJK, A. M. G.; VAN CRANENBURGH, S.; CHORUS, C. G.; DOBBE, R. I. J. Integral system safety for machine learning in the public sector: An empirical account. Government Information Quarterly, v.41, n.3, 101963, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101963

GJALTEMA, J.; BIESBROEK, R.; TERMEER, K. From government to governance…to meta-governance: a systematic literature review. Public Management Review, v. 22, n. 12, p. 1760–1780, 1 dez. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1648697

HOOGE, E. H.; WASLANDER, S.; THEISENS, H. C. The many shapes and sizes of meta-governance. An empirical study of strategies applied by a well-advanced meta-governor: the case of Dutch central government in education. Public Management Review, v. 24, n. 10, p. 1591–1609, 2022. DOI: HTTPS://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1916063

JAMES, K. L.; RANDALL, N. P.; HADDAWAY, N. R. A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, v. 5, n. 1, p. 7, dez. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6

KUZIEMSKI, M.; MISURACA, G. AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, v. 44, n. 6, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976

LA COUR, A.; HØJLUND, H. Polyphonic Supervision—Meta‐governance in Denmark. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, v. 34, n. 2, p. 148–162, mar. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2449

LARSSON, O. L. Meta-governance and the segregated city: difficulties with realizing the participatory ethos in network governance – evidence from Malmö City, Sweden. Policy Studies, v. 42, n. 4, p. 362–380, 4 jul. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1634188.

LAWRENCE, C.; CUI, I.; HO, D. E. The Bureaucratic Challenge to AI Governance: An Empirical Assessment of Implementation at U.S. Federal Agencies. In: AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY (AIES), 2023, Montréal. Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023. p. 606–652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3600211.3604701.

MAHUSIN, N.; SALLEHUDIN, H.; SATAR, N. S. M. Malaysia Public Sector Challenges of Implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI). IEEE Access, v. 12, p. 121035–121051, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3448311.

MARAGNO, G.; TANGI, L.; GASTALDI, L.; BENEDETTI, M. et al. The spread of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: a worldwide overview. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE (ICEGOV), 14., 2021, Athens. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021. p. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494194.

MELLOULI, S.; JANSSEN, M.; OJO, A. Introduction to the Issue on Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: Risks and Benefits of AI for Governments. Digital Government: Research and Practice, v. 5, n. 1, art. 1, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3636550.

MERGEL, I. DICKINSON, H.; STENVALL, J.; GASCO, M. Implementing AI in the public sector. Public Management Review, p. 1-14, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2231950.

MIKHAYLOV, S. J.; ESTEVE, M.; CAMPION, A. Artificial intelligence for the public sector: Opportunities and challenges of cross-sector collaboration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, v. 376, n. 2128, art. 20170357, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0357.

NAGBØL, P. R.; KRANCHER, O.; MÜLLER, O. Challenges and design principles for the evaluation of productive AI systems in the public sector. In: CHARALABIDIS, Y.; MEDAGLIA, R.; VAN NOORDT, C. (ed.). Research Handbook on Public Management and Artificial Intelligence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024. p. 245–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802207347.00025

NZOBONIMPA, S. Artificial intelligence, task complexity and uncertainty: analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of using algorithms in public service delivery under public administration theories. Digital Transformation and Society, v. 2, n. 3, p. 219–234, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DTS-03-2023-0018.

PAGE, M. J.; MCKENZIE, J. E.; BOSSUYT, P. M.; BOUTRON, I.; HOFFMANN, T. C.; MULROW, C. D.; SHAMSEER, L.; TETZLAFF, J. M.; AKL, E. A.; BRENNAN, S. E.; CHOU, R.; GLANVILLE, J.; GRIMSHAW, J. M.; HRÓBJARTSSON, A.; LALU, M. M.; LI, T.; LODER, E. W.; MAYO-WILSON, E.; MCDONALD, S.; MCGUINNESS, L. A.; STEWART, L. A.; THOMAS, J.; TRICCO, A. C.; WELCH, V. A.; WHITING, P.; MOHER, D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, v. 372, art. n71, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

PETERSEN, K.; FELDT, R.; MUJTABA, S.; MATTSSON, M. Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (EASE), 12., 2008, Bari. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. Swindon: BCS Learning & Development, 2008. p. 68–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.8

SØRENSEN, C. H.; HANSSON, L.; RYE, T. The role of meta-governance in public transport systems: A comparison of major urban regions in Denmark and England. Transport Policy, v. 130, p. 37-45, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.018

STRAUB, V. J. MORGAN, D.; BRIGHT, J.; MARGETTS, H. Artificial intelligence in government: concepts, standards, and a unified framework. Government Information Quarterly, v. 40, n. 4, art. 101881, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101881.

SUN, T. Q.; MEDAGLIA, R. Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, v. 36, n. 2, p. 368–383, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008.

TRONDAL, J. An organisational approach to meta-governance: structuring reforms through organisational (re-)engineering. Policy and Politics, v. 50, n. 2, p. 139–159, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16336164441825.

WIRTZ, B. W.; LANGER, P. F.; FENNER, C. Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector - a Research Agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, v. 44, n. 13, p. 1103–1128, 3 out. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1947319.

YFANTIS, V.; NTALIANIS, K.; NTALIANIS, F. Exploring the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: Welcome to the Clerkless Public Offices. Applications in Education. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, v. 17, p. 76–79, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/232010.2020.17.9.

ZUIDERWIJK, A.; CHEN, Y.-C.; SALEM, F. Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, v. 38, n. 3, art. 101577, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-09-10

Como Citar

Metagovernança e Inteligência Artificial no setor público. (2026). Revista Do Serviço Público, 77(2), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.21874/e606pf49