Legal-institutional design effects on mission-oriented dynamic capabilities

case study of two Brazilian innovation agencies

Autores

  • Eduardo Spanó Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6927-0100
  • Rafael Monnerat Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4777-2345
  • Rafael Leite Instituto Alemão de Pesquisa em Administração Pública (Deutsches Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung Speyer – FÖV), Speyer, Alemanha https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6051-1908
  • Carlos Américo Pacheco Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-0683
  • Dra. Maria Beatriz M. Bonacelli Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0795-7684

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21874/pstzjp91

Palavras-chave:

dynamic capabilities, mission-oriented innovation policies, innovation agencies, legal institutions

Resumo

While policymakers and academics have advocated for mission-oriented innovation policies to address global challenges, implementing those policies requires strong adaptive capabilities in innovation agencies, which are influenced by their legal-institutional design. This paper explores how the legal-institutional design of two Brazilian innovation agencies shapes organizational routines that affect the development of dynamic capabilities needed for missions. The findings enhance the understanding of these designs, offering insights for policymakers to (re)design more effective innovation agencies.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Eduardo Spanó, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil

    Doutorando em Política Científica e Tecnológica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Mestre em Administração Pública, Universidade Columbia. Bacharel em Direito, Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Fundador do Instituto Jataí

  • Rafael Monnerat, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil

    Mestrando em Política Científica e Tecnológica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Bacharel em Direito, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). 

  • Rafael Leite, Instituto Alemão de Pesquisa em Administração Pública (Deutsches Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung Speyer – FÖV), Speyer, Alemanha

    Bolsista German Chancellor Fellowship, Fundação Alexander von Humboldt. Pesquisador visitante no Instituto Alemão de Pesquisa em Administração Pública (FÖV). Bacharel em Administração Pública, Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV/EAESP).

  • Carlos Américo Pacheco, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil

    Professor aposentado, Instituto de Economia e  Instituto de Geociência, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Titular da Cátedra IA Responsável do Instituto de Estudos Avançados, Universidade de São Paulo (IEA/USP). Pesquisador da Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV). Doutor em Ciências Econômicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), com pós-doutorado na Universidade Columbia. Bacharel em Engenharia Eletrônica, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA).

  • Dra. Maria Beatriz M. Bonacelli, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil

    Professora Titular do Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica do Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (DPCT/IG/UNICAMP). Doutora em Ciências Econômicas, Université des Sciences Sociales de Toulouse. Mestre em Política Científica e Tecnológica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Graduada em Ciências Econômicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP).

Referências

Antón, G. D. (2008). Censura de la huida del derecho administrativo a través de sociedades comerciales. Revista de Derecho, 7(13), 125–162. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/814

Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Inovação Industrial (Embrapii). (2024, March). Annual report on activities performed from January to December 2023. Brasília, DF: Embrapii. Retrieved from https://embrapii.org.br/wp-content/images/2024/04/Relatorio-Gestao-2023_30042024.pdf on July 19, 2024.

Azevedo, P. F., Saes, M. S. M., Schnaider, P., Morgulis, M. C. A., Franceschini, A. S. N., Santana, S., & Carvalho, T. B. (2018). Brazil: Building capabilities for technology and innovation. In J. Cornick, E. Dal Bó, E. Fernández-Arias, G. Rivas, & E. Stein (Eds.), Building capabilities for productive development (Vol. 1, pp. 123–172). Inter-American Development Bank.

Breznitz, D., Ornston, D., & Samford, S. (2018). Mission critical: the ends, means, and design of innovation agencies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 883–896. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty027

Berwick, E., & Christia, F. (2018). State capacity redux: Integrating classical and experimental contributions to an enduring debate. Annual Review of Political Science, 21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-072215-012907

Billis, D. (2010). Towards a theory of hybrid organizations. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy (pp. 46–69). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bonvillian, W. B. (2014). The new model innovation agencies: An overview. Science and Public Policy, 41(4), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct059

Brandsen, T., & Karré, P. M. (2011). Hybrid organizations: No cause for concern? International Journal of Public Administration, 34(13), 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.605090

Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (1998). Uma reforma gerencial da administração pública no Brasil. Revista do Serviço Público (RSP), 49(1), 5–42. Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP). https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v49i1.360

Caldas, M. J. A. (2001). A USP e seus desafios – Modulo 01 (1st ed.). São Paulo, SP, Brasil: EDUSP.

Cingolani, L. (2018). The role of state capacity in development studies. Journal of Development Perspectives, 5(2), 88–114. https://doi.org/10.5325/jdevepers.2.1-2.0088

Corder, S., Buainain, A. M., Hollanda, S., & Pacheco, C. A. (2023). O potencial e os limites do FNDCT para financiar a inovação no Brasil. Revista Do Serviço Público 74(1), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v74i1.9961.

Deakin, S., Gindis, D., Hodgson, G. M., Huang, K., & Pistor, K. (2017). Legal institutionalism: Capitalism and the constitutive role of law. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.04.005.

Delgado, P. S. (2014). “Huida” ilegal del derecho administrativo: Las fundaciones de la presidencia de la república y la ley de transparencia. Anuario de Derecho Público, (1), 441–468. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265333716_Huida_ilegal_del_Derecho_Administrativo_las_Fundaciones_de_la_Presidencia_de_la_Republica_y_la_Ley_de_Transparencia

Embrapii. (2024, January 5). Com R$ 677 milhões, Embrapii bate recorde de investimento em inovação em 2023 [With R$ 677 million, Embrapii sets record for innovation investment in 2023]. Retrieved September 3, 2024, from https://embrapii.org.br/com-r-677-milhoes-embrapii-bate-recorde-de-investimento-em-inovacao-em-2023/

Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public Procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the Demand Side, Research Policy, 36, 949–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003

Eriksson, T. (2014). Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.05.001

European Commission. (2018). Towards a mission-oriented research and innovation policy in the EU.

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep). (2024). Lei Orçamentária Anual. Retrieved September 3, 2024, from http://finep.gov.br/a-finep-externo/fndct/lei-orcamentaria-anual.

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep). (2024). Finep’s statute approved by 18th extraordinary general assembly on April 30th, 2024.

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep). (2023). Relatório Anual Integrado da Finep 2023. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. Retrieved July 18, 2024, from http://www.finep.gov.br/images/acesso-a-informacao/Relatorios/2024/29_05_2024_RAI_2023_final.pdf

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001182

Gieske, H., van Buuren, A., & Bekker, V. (2016). Conceptualizing Public Innovative Capacity: A Framework for Assessment. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 21(1), 25. hdl.handle.net/1765/86056

Gompers, P. A., Gornall, W., Kaplan, S. N., & Strebulaev, I. A. (2020). How do venture capitalists make decisions? Journal of Financial Economics, 135(1), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.011

Kattel, R. (2022). Dynamic capabilities of the public sector: Towards a new synthesis (Working Paper). IIPP/UCL.

Kattel, R., Drechsler, W., & Karo, E. (2022). How to make an entrepreneurial state: Why innovation needs bureaucracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty032.

Laplane, A. (2024). Market co-creating and shaping through investments in innovation: a comparative analysis of two public funding programmes in Brazil. Innovation and Development, 14(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2021.1989646

Larrue, P. (2021). The design and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies: A new systemic policy approach to address societal challenges. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, n. 100. https://doi.org/10.1787/3f6c76a4-en.

Limoeiro, D., & Schneider, B. R. (2017). State-led innovation: SOEs, institutional fragmentation, and policy making in Brazil. MIT-IPC Working Paper, 17-004.

Mazzucato, M., & Penna, C. (2016). The Brazilian innovation system: a mission-oriented policy proposal. Avaliação de Programas em CT&I. Apoio ao Programa Nacional de Ciência (Plataformas de conhecimento). Brasília, DF: Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos.

Mazzucato, M. (2018). The value of everything: Making and taking in the global economy. New York: PublicAffairs.

Mazzucato, M. (2018a) Missions: Mission-Oriented Research & Innovation in the European Union, European Commission, Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/mazzucato_report_2018.pdf, accessed 8 Nov. 2022.

Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission economy: A moonshot guide to changing capitalism (1st ed.). Allen Lane.

Meijer, A. (2019). Public innovation capacity: developing and testing a self-assessment survey instrument. International Journal of Public Administration, 42 (8), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498102.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Mayne, Q., De Jong, J., & Fernandez-Monge, F. (2020). State Capabilities for Problem-Oriented Governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 3 (1): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz023.

Ministério da Gestão e da Inovação em Serviços Públicos. (2023, May 17). Boletim das Organizações Sociais: EMBRAPII. Governo Federal. Retrieved from https://www.gov.br/gestao/pt-br/assuntos/estruturas-organizacionais/organizacoes-sociais/20230517_boletim_embrapii_vfinal.pdf on July 19, 2024.

Monteiro, V. (2021). Características do sistema jurídico brasileiro de fomento estatal à inovação: A formação da institucionalidade estatal de ciência, tecnologia e inovação e a sua convergência atual sob o tema da inovação. USP.

Oliveira, J. F. G., & Guimarães, J. A. (2019). Building trust in innovation: The case of EMBRAPII. In E. B. Reynolds, B. R. Schneider, & E. Zylberberg (Eds.), Innovation in Brazil: Advancing development in the 21st century (pp. 231–255). Routledge.

Pacheco, C. A. (2019). Institutional dimensions of innovation policy in Brazil. In E. B. Reynolds, B. R. Schneider, & E. Zylberberg (Eds.), Innovation in Brazil: Advancing development in the 21st century (pp. 171–188). Routledge.

Piening, E. P. (2013). Dynamic capabilities in public organizations: A literature review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 15(2), 209–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.708358

Pinto, H. M. (2010). A autarquização das empresas estatais na jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal: Um obstáculo para as reformas na administração pública. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 15(57). https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v15n57.3255

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. 2011. Public Management Reform: A comparative analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reynolds, E. B., Schneider, B. R., & Zylberberg, E. (Eds.). (2019). Innovation in Brazil: Advancing development in the 21st century (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429053092

Sabel, C. F., & Victor, D. G. (2022). Fixing the climate: Strategies for an uncertain world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Salles-Filho, S., Bin, A., Bonilla, K., & Colugnati, F. A. B. (2021). Effectiveness by design: Overcoming orientation and transaction-related barriers in research-industry linkages. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 25(5), e190346. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021190346.en

Salomón, D. A. S. (2015). La huida del derecho administrativo en España y en Colombia. Un panorama desde las entidades descentralizadas. Derecho Público, (34), 19. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7477827

Silva, M. S., Schmidt, F. de H., & Kliass, P. (Ed.). (2017). State-owned enterprises: Public policies, governance, and performance. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea). https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/9505

Silva, P. I. P. da. (2018). Regulamentos de licitações editados sob a Lei n. 13.303/2016: Instrumentos de inovação ou de repetição? Rio de Janeiro: FGV EBAPE – Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas.

Spanó, E., Monnerat, R., Pacheco, C. A., & Bonacelli, M. B. M. (2024). Legal–institutional design and dynamic capabilities for mission-oriented innovation agencies: A new framework. Science and Public Policy, 51(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad065

Strauss Klein, M. F. (2012). La nueva gestión pública, la huída del derecho administrativo y el retorno al derecho público. Retrieved from https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/112914

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z

UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO science report: The race against time for smarter development. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology, and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015

Wong, S. C. Y. (2004). Improving corporate governance in SOEs: An integrated approach. Corporate Governance International, 7(2), 5–15. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=897121

Wong, S. C. Y. (2018). The state of governance at state-owned enterprises. Private Sector Opinion, 40. International Finance Corporation. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/b1adde06-267d-4d79-bfaf-62f17de51f4a/PSO40.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=m7T0xLQ

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.

.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-05-22

Como Citar

Legal-institutional design effects on mission-oriented dynamic capabilities: case study of two Brazilian innovation agencies. (2026). Revista Do Serviço Público, 77(2), 218-246. https://doi.org/10.21874/pstzjp91