Efectos del diseño jurídico-institucional sobre las capacidades dinámicas orientadas a misiones

estudio de caso de dos agencias brasileñas de innovación

Autores/as

  • Eduardo Spanó Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6927-0100
  • Rafael Monnerat Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4777-2345
  • Rafael Leite Instituto Alemán de Investigación en Administración Pública (Deutsches Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung Speyer – FÖV), Speyer, Alemania https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6051-1908
  • Carlos Américo Pacheco Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-0683
  • Dra. Maria Beatriz M. Bonacelli Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0795-7684

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21874/pstzjp91

Palabras clave:

capacidades dinámicas, políticas de innovación orientadas a misiones, agencias de innovación, instituciones jurídicas

Resumen

Formuladores de políticas públicas y los académicos han defendido políticas de innovación orientadas a misiones para abordar los desafíos globales. Sin embargo, la implementación de dichas políticas requiere sólidas capacidades adaptativas en las agencias de innovación, las cuales están influenciadas por su diseño jurídico-institucional. Este artículo explora cómo el diseño jurídico-institucional de dos agencias de innovación brasileñas moldea las rutinas organizacionales que afectan el desarrollo de las capacidades dinámicas necesarias para las misiones. Los hallazgos amplían la comprensión de estos diseños y ofrecen aportes para que los responsables de políticas (re)diseñen agencias de innovación más eficaces.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Eduardo Spanó, Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil

    Doctorando en Política Científica y Tecnológica, Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Máster en Administración Pública, Universidad de Columbia. Licenciado en Derecho, Universidad de São Paulo (USP).  Fundador del Instituto Jataí.

  • Rafael Monnerat, Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil

    Candidato a máster en Política Científica y Tecnológica, Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Licenciado en Derecho, Universidad Federal de Río de Janeiro (UFRJ).

  • Rafael Leite, Instituto Alemán de Investigación en Administración Pública (Deutsches Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung Speyer – FÖV), Speyer, Alemania

    Becario del German Chancellor Fellowship, Fundación Alexander von Humboldt. Investigador visitante en el Instituto Alemán de Investigación en Administración Pública (FÖV). Licenciado en Administración Pública, Fundación Getulio Vargas (FGV/EAESP).

  • Carlos Américo Pacheco, Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil

    Profesor jubilado, Instituto de Economía y  Instituto de Geociencias, Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Titular de la Cátedra de IA Responsable, Instituto de Estudios Avanzados, Universidad de São Paulo (IEA/USP). Investigador, Fundación Getúlio Vargas (FGV). Doctor en Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), con posdoctorado en la Universidad de Columbia. Licenciado en Ingeniería Electrónica, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA).

  • Dra. Maria Beatriz M. Bonacelli, Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica (DPCT), Campinas/SP, Brasil

    Profesora Titular del Departamento de Política Científica y Tecnológica del Instituto de Geociencias, Universidad Estadual de Campinas (DPCT/IG/UNICAMP). Doctora en Ciencias Económicas, Université des Sciences Sociales de Toulouse. Máster en Política Científica y Tecnológica, Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Licenciada en Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP).

Referencias

Antón, G. D. (2008). Censura de la huida del derecho administrativo a través de sociedades comerciales. Revista de Derecho, 7(13), 125–162. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/814

Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Inovação Industrial (Embrapii). (2024, March). Annual report on activities performed from January to December 2023. Brasília, DF: Embrapii. Retrieved from https://embrapii.org.br/wp-content/images/2024/04/Relatorio-Gestao-2023_30042024.pdf on July 19, 2024.

Azevedo, P. F., Saes, M. S. M., Schnaider, P., Morgulis, M. C. A., Franceschini, A. S. N., Santana, S., & Carvalho, T. B. (2018). Brazil: Building capabilities for technology and innovation. In J. Cornick, E. Dal Bó, E. Fernández-Arias, G. Rivas, & E. Stein (Eds.), Building capabilities for productive development (Vol. 1, pp. 123–172). Inter-American Development Bank.

Breznitz, D., Ornston, D., & Samford, S. (2018). Mission critical: the ends, means, and design of innovation agencies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 883–896. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty027

Berwick, E., & Christia, F. (2018). State capacity redux: Integrating classical and experimental contributions to an enduring debate. Annual Review of Political Science, 21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-072215-012907

Billis, D. (2010). Towards a theory of hybrid organizations. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy (pp. 46–69). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bonvillian, W. B. (2014). The new model innovation agencies: An overview. Science and Public Policy, 41(4), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct059

Brandsen, T., & Karré, P. M. (2011). Hybrid organizations: No cause for concern? International Journal of Public Administration, 34(13), 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.605090

Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (1998). Uma reforma gerencial da administração pública no Brasil. Revista do Serviço Público (RSP), 49(1), 5–42. Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP). https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v49i1.360

Caldas, M. J. A. (2001). A USP e seus desafios – Modulo 01 (1st ed.). São Paulo, SP, Brasil: EDUSP.

Cingolani, L. (2018). The role of state capacity in development studies. Journal of Development Perspectives, 5(2), 88–114. https://doi.org/10.5325/jdevepers.2.1-2.0088

Corder, S., Buainain, A. M., Hollanda, S., & Pacheco, C. A. (2023). O potencial e os limites do FNDCT para financiar a inovação no Brasil. Revista Do Serviço Público 74(1), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v74i1.9961.

Deakin, S., Gindis, D., Hodgson, G. M., Huang, K., & Pistor, K. (2017). Legal institutionalism: Capitalism and the constitutive role of law. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.04.005.

Delgado, P. S. (2014). “Huida” ilegal del derecho administrativo: Las fundaciones de la presidencia de la república y la ley de transparencia. Anuario de Derecho Público, (1), 441–468. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265333716_Huida_ilegal_del_Derecho_Administrativo_las_Fundaciones_de_la_Presidencia_de_la_Republica_y_la_Ley_de_Transparencia

Embrapii. (2024, January 5). Com R$ 677 milhões, Embrapii bate recorde de investimento em inovação em 2023 [With R$ 677 million, Embrapii sets record for innovation investment in 2023]. Retrieved September 3, 2024, from https://embrapii.org.br/com-r-677-milhoes-embrapii-bate-recorde-de-investimento-em-inovacao-em-2023/

Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public Procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the Demand Side, Research Policy, 36, 949–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003

Eriksson, T. (2014). Processes, antecedents and outcomes of dynamic capabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.05.001

European Commission. (2018). Towards a mission-oriented research and innovation policy in the EU.

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep). (2024). Lei Orçamentária Anual. Retrieved September 3, 2024, from http://finep.gov.br/a-finep-externo/fndct/lei-orcamentaria-anual.

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep). (2024). Finep’s statute approved by 18th extraordinary general assembly on April 30th, 2024.

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep). (2023). Relatório Anual Integrado da Finep 2023. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. Retrieved July 18, 2024, from http://www.finep.gov.br/images/acesso-a-informacao/Relatorios/2024/29_05_2024_RAI_2023_final.pdf

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001182

Gieske, H., van Buuren, A., & Bekker, V. (2016). Conceptualizing Public Innovative Capacity: A Framework for Assessment. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 21(1), 25. hdl.handle.net/1765/86056

Gompers, P. A., Gornall, W., Kaplan, S. N., & Strebulaev, I. A. (2020). How do venture capitalists make decisions? Journal of Financial Economics, 135(1), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.011

Kattel, R. (2022). Dynamic capabilities of the public sector: Towards a new synthesis (Working Paper). IIPP/UCL.

Kattel, R., Drechsler, W., & Karo, E. (2022). How to make an entrepreneurial state: Why innovation needs bureaucracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty032.

Laplane, A. (2024). Market co-creating and shaping through investments in innovation: a comparative analysis of two public funding programmes in Brazil. Innovation and Development, 14(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2021.1989646

Larrue, P. (2021). The design and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies: A new systemic policy approach to address societal challenges. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, n. 100. https://doi.org/10.1787/3f6c76a4-en.

Limoeiro, D., & Schneider, B. R. (2017). State-led innovation: SOEs, institutional fragmentation, and policy making in Brazil. MIT-IPC Working Paper, 17-004.

Mazzucato, M., & Penna, C. (2016). The Brazilian innovation system: a mission-oriented policy proposal. Avaliação de Programas em CT&I. Apoio ao Programa Nacional de Ciência (Plataformas de conhecimento). Brasília, DF: Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos.

Mazzucato, M. (2018). The value of everything: Making and taking in the global economy. New York: PublicAffairs.

Mazzucato, M. (2018a) Missions: Mission-Oriented Research & Innovation in the European Union, European Commission, Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/mazzucato_report_2018.pdf, accessed 8 Nov. 2022.

Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission economy: A moonshot guide to changing capitalism (1st ed.). Allen Lane.

Meijer, A. (2019). Public innovation capacity: developing and testing a self-assessment survey instrument. International Journal of Public Administration, 42 (8), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498102.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Mayne, Q., De Jong, J., & Fernandez-Monge, F. (2020). State Capabilities for Problem-Oriented Governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 3 (1): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz023.

Ministério da Gestão e da Inovação em Serviços Públicos. (2023, May 17). Boletim das Organizações Sociais: EMBRAPII. Governo Federal. Retrieved from https://www.gov.br/gestao/pt-br/assuntos/estruturas-organizacionais/organizacoes-sociais/20230517_boletim_embrapii_vfinal.pdf on July 19, 2024.

Monteiro, V. (2021). Características do sistema jurídico brasileiro de fomento estatal à inovação: A formação da institucionalidade estatal de ciência, tecnologia e inovação e a sua convergência atual sob o tema da inovação. USP.

Oliveira, J. F. G., & Guimarães, J. A. (2019). Building trust in innovation: The case of EMBRAPII. In E. B. Reynolds, B. R. Schneider, & E. Zylberberg (Eds.), Innovation in Brazil: Advancing development in the 21st century (pp. 231–255). Routledge.

Pacheco, C. A. (2019). Institutional dimensions of innovation policy in Brazil. In E. B. Reynolds, B. R. Schneider, & E. Zylberberg (Eds.), Innovation in Brazil: Advancing development in the 21st century (pp. 171–188). Routledge.

Piening, E. P. (2013). Dynamic capabilities in public organizations: A literature review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 15(2), 209–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.708358

Pinto, H. M. (2010). A autarquização das empresas estatais na jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal: Um obstáculo para as reformas na administração pública. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 15(57). https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v15n57.3255

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. 2011. Public Management Reform: A comparative analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reynolds, E. B., Schneider, B. R., & Zylberberg, E. (Eds.). (2019). Innovation in Brazil: Advancing development in the 21st century (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429053092

Sabel, C. F., & Victor, D. G. (2022). Fixing the climate: Strategies for an uncertain world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Salles-Filho, S., Bin, A., Bonilla, K., & Colugnati, F. A. B. (2021). Effectiveness by design: Overcoming orientation and transaction-related barriers in research-industry linkages. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 25(5), e190346. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2021190346.en

Salomón, D. A. S. (2015). La huida del derecho administrativo en España y en Colombia. Un panorama desde las entidades descentralizadas. Derecho Público, (34), 19. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7477827

Silva, M. S., Schmidt, F. de H., & Kliass, P. (Ed.). (2017). State-owned enterprises: Public policies, governance, and performance. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea). https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/9505

Silva, P. I. P. da. (2018). Regulamentos de licitações editados sob a Lei n. 13.303/2016: Instrumentos de inovação ou de repetição? Rio de Janeiro: FGV EBAPE – Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas.

Spanó, E., Monnerat, R., Pacheco, C. A., & Bonacelli, M. B. M. (2024). Legal–institutional design and dynamic capabilities for mission-oriented innovation agencies: A new framework. Science and Public Policy, 51(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad065

Strauss Klein, M. F. (2012). La nueva gestión pública, la huída del derecho administrativo y el retorno al derecho público. Retrieved from https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/112914

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z

UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO science report: The race against time for smarter development. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology, and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015

Wong, S. C. Y. (2004). Improving corporate governance in SOEs: An integrated approach. Corporate Governance International, 7(2), 5–15. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=897121

Wong, S. C. Y. (2018). The state of governance at state-owned enterprises. Private Sector Opinion, 40. International Finance Corporation. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/b1adde06-267d-4d79-bfaf-62f17de51f4a/PSO40.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=m7T0xLQ

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.

.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-05-22

Cómo citar

Efectos del diseño jurídico-institucional sobre las capacidades dinámicas orientadas a misiones: estudio de caso de dos agencias brasileñas de innovación. (2026). Revista Do Serviço Público, 77(2), 218-246. https://doi.org/10.21874/pstzjp91